Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC)
Governance, risk and compliance. A working risk register, a control matrix, vendor risk assessment, and a review calendar that actually runs.
What we deliver
Technology risks recorded with likelihood and impact, assigned an owner, and mitigation actions tracked. An unowned risk is an unmanaged one.
A map of which control addresses which risk and who owns it, with a single control set where several regulations overlap.
Critical vendors assessed on commitments, certifications and incident notification obligations, with missing contract clauses flagged.
Information security policies written to match how the organization actually works. A policy nobody reads produces audit findings.
Risk assessment, internal audit and management review placed on an annual calendar. A management system without a calendar stalls in year two.
Risk position, open findings and action progress reported to management regularly, in a format that can be compared period to period.
How it works
Every engagement follows the same five steps: baseline the current state, design the target model, roll out in stages, operate it, and improve against measurements.
Assess
Baseline the current state, name the gaps and put the success criteria in writing.
Design
Architect the target operating model and the toolchain it needs.
Deploy
Implement, configure and validate in a staged rollout.
Operate
24/7 management with contracted response times and proactive monitoring.
Improve
Continuous improvement driven by metrics, incidents and changes in the business.
Every engagement runs under a written SLA: a commitment, not a best-effort promise.
Dedicated engineers who know your stack. No generalist help-desk tier in between.
Service reviews every two weeks, roadmap updates every quarter.
Knowledge Hub
What we have written about running and managing technology, collected in one place.
Choosing an MSP: What Turkish Companies Actually Want
7 min readHow Long ISO 27001 Certification Actually Takes
4 min read10 Questions to Ask When Choosing a Managed Service Provider
5 min readDoes Türkiye's Cybersecurity Law Apply to You? The 15 Critical Infrastructure Sectors
5 min read01What does IT governance mean in practice?
Writing down who makes decisions, on what information and with what authority. Where nobody clearly owns change approval, risk acceptance, investment decisions and exceptions, every decision is settled by argument.
02Does keeping a risk register actually help?
If it is kept current, yes. It only works if every risk has an owner, an acceptance decision and a review date. A register without owners becomes a document shown at audit that nobody reads.
03Is accepting a risk a legitimate option?
Yes, one of four: reduce, transfer, avoid, accept. What matters is that acceptance is deliberate, written and made by someone with the authority. A risk carried without a decision has not been accepted.
04How do you close the gap between IT and business units?
Through a service catalog and shared measures. A service description in the business unit's language, with an agreed service level, gets both sides talking about the same thing. Technical metrics alone do not build that bridge.
05What should management reporting look like?
Short, comparative and decision-oriented: where service levels sit against target, which risks are open, which decisions are waiting. A fifty-page technical report to the board produces the same result as no report at all.
Let's work out where to start
Within two weeks you get it in writing: what works, what carries risk, and a prioritized roadmap.
Request a conversation